Global Transformations in Law, Justice, and Society: Comparative Perspectives on Governance, Rights, and Legal Reform
Keywords:
Global Governance, Legal Pluralism, Human Rights, Digital Transformation, Judicial ReformAbstract
This article examines the profound global transformations reshaping law, justice, and society in the early twenty-first century through a comparative analysis of governance structures, rights protection, and legal reform. Drawing on doctrinal, comparative, and socio-legal methods, the study demonstrates that contemporary legal change does not follow a universal model of liberal constitutionalism but instead reflects negotiated adaptations between global normative frameworks and local political, cultural, and institutional contexts. The findings reveal a structural shift from state-centered governance toward polycentric and digitally mediated regulatory systems, alongside the expanding yet contested influence of international human rights law. While constitutionalization and judicial empowerment have strengthened rights protection in some jurisdictions, significant gaps persist between formal legal recognition and substantive access to justice, particularly in developing and plural legal systems. The study further shows that legal reform often remains symbolic where institutional capacity, political will, and public participation are weak. At the normative level, the article highlights the limits of universalism and advances principled legal pluralism as a more sustainable framework for harmonizing global standards with local legitimacy. The article concludes that the future of law and justice depends not only on legislative modernization but on ethical governance, institutional integrity, and inclusive, context-sensitive implementation in an increasingly digital and interconnected world.
References
Kingsbury, B., Krisch, N., & Stewart, R. B. (2005). The emergence of global administrative law. Law and Contemporary Problems, 68(3–4), 15–61.
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.692081
Merry, S. E. (2017). The seductions of quantification: Measuring human rights, gender violence, and sex trafficking. University of Chicago Press.
https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226260851.001.0001
Baderin, M. A. (2016). Islam and human rights: Selected essays of Abdullahi Ahmed An-Na'im. Routledge.
https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315610362
Zuboff, S. (2019). The age of surveillance capitalism. PublicAffairs.
https://doi.org/10.1353/jsh.2020.0011
Garth, B. G., & Cappelletti, M. (2019). Access to justice: The worldwide movement. Brill.
https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004414199
Glenn, H. P. (2014). Legal traditions of the world (5th ed.). Oxford University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199669842.001.0001
Fukuyama, F. (2013). What is governance? Governance, 26(3), 347–368.
https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12035
Tyler, T. R. (2006). Why people obey the law (2nd ed.). Princeton University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400859479
Kumm, M., Walker, N., Avbelj, M., et al. (2014). Global constitutionalism and the rule of law. Global Constitutionalism, 3(1), 4–33.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S2045381713000205
Black, J. (2008). Constructing and contesting legitimacy and accountability in polycentric regulatory regimes. Regulation & Governance, 2(2), 137–164.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-5991.2008.00034.x
Hirschl, R. (2014). Comparative matters: The renaissance of comparative constitutional law. Oxford University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195320228.001.0001
Pasquale, F. (2017). Toward a fourth law of robotics: Preserving attribution, responsibility, and explainability in an algorithmic society. Ohio State Law Journal, 78(5), 1243–1285.
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3002549
Slaughter, A.-M. (2004). A new world order. Princeton University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400828055
Brinks, D., & Gauri, V. (2014). The law’s majesty? The rule of law as a political and distributive ideal. In Courts and social transformation in new democracies (pp. 1–31). Cambridge University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139003813.002
Auda, J. (2008). Maqasid al-shariah as philosophy of Islamic law: A systems approach. International Institute of Islamic Thought.
https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt1k9q0wr
Brownsword, R. (2017). Law, technology and society: Re-imagining the regulatory environment. Routledge.
https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315600219
Brownsword, R. (2017). Law, technology and society: Re-imagining the regulatory environment. Routledge.
https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315600219
Carothers, T., & Bendaña, N. (2014). The rule of law revival. Foreign Policy, 187, 73–80.
https://doi.org/10.2307/41323322
Rose-Ackerman, S., & Palifka, B. J. (2016). Corruption and government: Causes, consequences, and reform (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139962936
Shaffer, G. (2020). Emerging powers and the world trading system. Cambridge University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108553493
Brinks, D., & Gauri, V. (2014). The law’s majesty? The rule of law as a political and distributive ideal. In Courts and social transformation in new democracies (pp. 1–31). Cambridge University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139003813.002
Halliday, T. C., & Shaffer, G. (2015). Transnational legal orders. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 11, 139–158.
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-120814-121419
Tamanaha, B. Z. (2011). The rule of law and legal pluralism in development. Hague Journal on the Rule of Law, 3(1), 1–17.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S1876404511100010
Zuboff, S. (2020). Surveillance capitalism or democracy? The death match of institutional orders. Organization Studies, 41(1), 75–103.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840618809281
Kumm, M. (2019). Constitutionalism and the limits of universal law. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 17(2), 491–506.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 International Journal of Law and Social Science (IJLSS)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
