Cybercrime Regulation and Digital Sovereignty in OIC Countries: Emerging Legal Trends and Future Directions

Authors

  • Bagdat Bagayev Al-Farabi Kazakh National University, Almaty, Kazakhstan Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.65960/ijlss.2.2.2026.16

Keywords:

Cybercrime Regulation, Digital Sovereignty, OIC Countries, Cybersecurity Governance, Digital Law

Abstract

The rapid expansion of digital technologies has transformed economic activities, governance structures, and social interactions across the member states of the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC). While digital transformation has generated significant opportunities for innovation and development, it has also increased exposure to cybercrime, cyber espionage, data breaches, cyberterrorism, and other transnational cyber threats. In response, OIC countries have increasingly adopted cybercrime legislation and digital governance policies aimed at protecting national security, critical infrastructure, and digital sovereignty. This study examines the evolving relationship between cybercrime regulation and digital sovereignty in selected OIC countries, focusing on emerging legal trends, regulatory challenges, and future governance frameworks.
Employing a qualitative doctrinal and comparative legal methodology, the research analyzes cybercrime laws, cybersecurity policies, data governance regulations, judicial approaches, and international legal instruments in countries including Pakistan, Malaysia, Indonesia, Saudi Arabia, and Türkiye. The study explores key issues such as cross-border cybercrime, data localization, artificial intelligence-related security risks, cloud computing dependency, digital surveillance, and state authority in cyberspace. The findings reveal that while OIC countries have made significant progress in strengthening cybercrime regulation, considerable differences remain regarding enforcement mechanisms, institutional capacity, cybersecurity strategies, and approaches to digital sovereignty. Furthermore, growing dependence on foreign digital platforms and technologies presents new challenges to national regulatory control and data governance.
The study argues that effective cyber governance in OIC countries requires a balanced approach that simultaneously protects national sovereignty, promotes digital innovation, safeguards fundamental rights, and enhances international cooperation. It proposes greater legal harmonization, stronger regional cybersecurity collaboration, and the development of an OIC-oriented framework for digital governance capable of addressing emerging cyber threats while supporting sustainable digital transformation. The research contributes to contemporary debates on cyber law, digital governance, and state sovereignty in an increasingly interconnected digital environment.

References

1. protection against cybercrime: A comparative legal analysis of Jordanian, Arab, and international legislations. Journal of Posthumanism, 5(4), 482–495. https://doi.org/10.63332/joph.v5i4.1271 DOI: https://doi.org/10.63332/joph.v5i4.1271

2. Al-Farjani, S. H., Ahmad, T., & Rana, H. A. S. (2025). Digital innovation, legal reform, and social justice: Interdisciplinary approaches to law, technology, and human rights. International Journal of Law and Social Sciences, 1(1), 91–129. https://doi.org/10.65960/ijlss.1.1.2025.5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.65960/ijlss.1.1.2025.5

3. Alwan, F. Y., & Lilo, I. Y. (2026). Defending religious tradition in modern times: Comparative responses of Muslim and Christian scholars to scriptural criticism. Global Islamic Research Journal, 2(1), 18–35. https://doi.org/10.65960/girj.2.1.2026.11 DOI: https://doi.org/10.65960/girj.2.1.2026.11

4. Bilal, H., & Khan, M. A. (2022). Cyber crime legislation in Pakistan: A critical analysis from Islamic law perspective. Al-Idah, 40(2), 164–177. https://doi.org/10.37556/al-idah.040.02.0802 DOI: https://doi.org/10.37556/al-idah.040.02.0802

5. Gul, S., Ahmad, F., & Ahmad, R. (2025). Digital evidence and procedural fairness: Reforming cybercrime prosecution in Pakistan. Journal for Social Science Archives, 3(2), 241–255. https://doi.org/10.59075/jssa.v3i2.260 DOI: https://doi.org/10.59075/jssa.v3i2.260

6. Hasanah, L. N., Faisal, M. S., Ahmed, Z., & Hasyim, M. Y. A. (2025). Religious diversity and the digital economy: Legal–academic pathways to harmonize Sharia and international law. International Journal of Law and Social Sciences, 1(1), 54–73. https://doi.org/10.65960/ijlss.1.1.2025.8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.65960/ijlss.1.1.2025.8

7. Hasnia, H., Hafiz, A., Rasna, R., Nurahman, D., & Parhusip, J. (2025). Reconstruction of criminal law policy in handling cyber crime: Perspectives of technology law and human rights. Jurnal Smart Hukum (JSH), 3(3), 1014–1026. https://doi.org/10.55299/jsh.v3i3.1328 DOI: https://doi.org/10.55299/jsh.v3i3.1328

8. Hassan, H. A., F., F., & Faiz, M. F. (2026). Defending the Prophetic Sunnah in the modern age: Contemporary Muslim scholarly responses to Hadith skepticism. Global Islamic Research Journal, 2(1), 96–109. https://doi.org/10.65960/girj.2.1.2026.12 DOI: https://doi.org/10.65960/girj.2.1.2026.12

9. Kamran, I. K. (2025). Legal basis of combating cybercrime: current problems and solutions. Uzhhorod National University Herald. Series: Law, 4(91), 260–266. https://doi.org/10.24144/2307-3322.2025.91.4.41 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24144/2307-3322.2025.91.4.41

10. Krishna, L. S. (2023). Digital sovereignty and cybersecurity governance: Legal implications of state control in a fragmented internet. Innovative Research Thoughts, 9(3), 88–95. https://doi.org/10.36676/irt.v9.i3.1648 DOI: https://doi.org/10.36676/irt.v9.i3.1648

11. Kwentoa, I. K. (2025). Cybersecurity in digital sovereignty: Protecting national digital ecosystems against foreign cyber infiltration in the age of decentralized technology. Journal of Next-Generation Research 5.0, 1(4), 512–525. https://doi.org/10.70792/jngr5.0.v1i4.130 DOI: https://doi.org/10.70792/jngr5.0.v1i4.130

12. Mustafa, A., Ishaque, M., Raza, R., Samiullah, & Raza, M. I. (2025). When culture meets Fiqh: Examining the legal authority of ʿUrf in contemporary engagement traditions. Global Islamic Research Journal, 1(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.65960/girj.1.1.2025.6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.65960/girj.1.1.2025.6

13. Pierucci, F. (2025). Sovereignty in the digital era: Rethinking territoriality and governance in cyberspace. Digital Society, 4(1), Article 189. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44206-025-00189-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s44206-025-00189-4

14. Pohle, J., & Thiel, T. (2020). Digital sovereignty. Internet Policy Review, 9(4), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.14763/2020.4.1532 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14763/2020.4.1532

15. Popko, V., & Popko, E. (2021). International legal regulation of transnational cybercrime in cyberspace. Uzhhorod National University Herald. Series: Law, 2(66), 273–278. https://doi.org/10.24144/2307-3322.2021.66.46 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24144/2307-3322.2021.66.46

16. Saleem, H. A. R., Bukhtiar, A., Zaheer, B., & Farooq, M. A. U. (2025). Challenges faced by the judiciary in implementing cybersecurity laws in Pakistan. The Critical Review of Social Sciences Studies, 4(1), 115–129. https://doi.org/10.59075/1wyx0v30 DOI: https://doi.org/10.59075/1wyx0v30

17. Satyo, B. K., & Prasetyo, B. A. Y. (2026). Artificial intelligence and the future of human rights: Legal accountability for algorithmic decision-making in democratic societies. International Journal of Law and Social Sciences, 2(1), 54–74. https://doi.org/10.65960/ijlss.2.1.2026.12 DOI: https://doi.org/10.65960/ijlss.2.1.2026.12

18. Siswanto, M. A., & Ahmad, T. (2026). Climate justice in Islamic legal thought: Harmonizing environmental law, human rights, and sustainable development in OIC countries. International Journal of Law and Social Sciences, 2(1), 20–41. https://doi.org/10.65960/ijlss.2.1.2026.14 DOI: https://doi.org/10.65960/ijlss.2.1.2026.14

19. Ullah, Z., Ullah, M. K., & Abbas, H. (2025). The impact of digital evidence laws on cybercrime prosecution in Pakistan. ACADEMIA International Journal for Social Sciences, 4(4), 180–195. https://doi.org/10.63056/acad.004.04.1373 DOI: https://doi.org/10.63056/ACAD.004.04.1373

20. Zahra, R., Qasim, M., Ali, M., Asef, J., & Ali, B. (2025). Addressing mental health stigma and digital harassment in Pakistan and Indonesia: Insights from Islamic principles and AI-driven cybersecurity law. Global Islamic Research Journal, 1(1), 77–92. https://doi.org/10.65960/girj.1.1.2025.1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.65960/girj.1.1.2025.1

📊 Statistics
📈 Abstract view : 73 times
📄 PDF views : 67 times
Citation Metrics :
cover page

Downloads

Published

06/25/2026

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Cybercrime Regulation and Digital Sovereignty in OIC Countries: Emerging Legal Trends and Future Directions. (2026). International Journal of Law and Social Sciences, 2(2), 103-120. https://doi.org/10.65960/ijlss.2.2.2026.16

Share