Digital Marketplaces and Consumer Protection: A Comparative Socio-Legal Analysis of E-Commerce Regulation in Islamic and Western Legal Systems

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.65960/ijlss.2.1.2026.11

Keywords:

Digital Marketplaces, Consumer protection, E-Commerce Regulation, Islamic Commercial Law, Comparative Legal Analysis

Abstract

The rapid development of digital technologies has transformed global commerce, leading to the emergence of digital marketplaces and platform-based economies that facilitate cross-border electronic transactions. While e-commerce platforms have expanded economic opportunities and improved consumer access to goods and services, they have also introduced significant legal challenges related to consumer protection, contractual transparency, and regulatory oversight. Consumers engaging in online transactions often face risks associated with misleading product information, unfair contractual terms, data privacy concerns, and difficulties in resolving disputes across jurisdictions. In response to these challenges, legal systems around the world have developed regulatory frameworks aimed at protecting consumer rights and ensuring fairness in digital commerce. This study examines the regulation of digital marketplaces through a comparative socio-legal analysis of e-commerce governance in Islamic and Western legal systems.

Using a qualitative doctrinal and comparative legal methodology, the research analyzes key legal principles governing electronic commerce, consumer protection policies, and dispute resolution mechanisms within both legal traditions. The study explores the ethical foundations of Islamic commercial law, including principles of fairness, transparency, and mutual consent in commercial transactions, and compares them with statutory regulatory frameworks developed in Western legal systems. The analysis also considers the socio-legal implications of digital commerce, including the influence of institutional structures, cultural values, and technological developments on the enforcement of consumer protection laws.

The findings indicate that both Islamic and Western legal systems share common objectives in promoting fairness and protecting consumers from deceptive commercial practices, although they differ in their legal methodologies and regulatory mechanisms. Western legal systems generally rely on comprehensive legislation and regulatory agencies to enforce consumer protection standards, while Islamic commercial jurisprudence integrates ethical principles with legal norms to guide market behavior. Despite these differences, both approaches emphasize transparency, accountability, and protection against exploitation in commercial transactions.

The study concludes that effective governance of digital marketplaces requires greater legal harmonization and international cooperation to address the cross-border challenges of global e-commerce. Strengthening transparency requirements, improving dispute resolution mechanisms, protecting consumer data, and promoting responsible platform governance are essential steps toward enhancing consumer protection in digital markets. Integrating ethical principles from diverse legal traditions may also contribute to developing more inclusive and balanced regulatory frameworks capable of supporting the continued growth of the global digital economy while safeguarding consumer rights.

References

Al Azhari, F. U., & Al Azhari, S. I. (2025). Contemporary challenges in harmonizing Sharia, national legal systems, and international law in a rapidly changing world. International Journal of Law and Social Sciences, 1(1), 130–150. https://doi.org/10.65960/ijlss.1.1.2025.4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.65960/ijlss.1.1.2025.4

Al Azhari, F. U., Shah, S. H. M., Al Azhari, S. I., Rasool, F., Ahmed, R., Samad, A., & Rehman, A. (2025). The role of Islamic economic principles in family law: A study on inheritance and property rights within the context of child protection. Global Islamic Research Journal, 1(1), 59–76. https://doi.org/10.65960/girj.1.1.2025.2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.65960/girj.1.1.2025.2

Alaloosh, M. S., Shaker, A., & Eliwy, S. H. (2026).

Securing digital trade: A techno-legal analysis of e-commerce safeguards in Iraq's regulation No. 4/2025.

Nusantara Journal of Law Studies, 5(1), 44–60.

Al-Farjani, S. H., Ahmad, T., & Rana, H. A. S. (2025). Digital innovation, legal reform, and social justice: Interdisciplinary approaches to law, technology, and human rights. International Journal of Law and Social Sciences, 1(1), 91–129. https://doi.org/10.65960/ijlss.1.1.2025.5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.65960/ijlss.1.1.2025.5

Anthony, D., & Stanhaus, A. (2026). Disrupting the information order in health care: Institutions, policy regimes, and the value of data. Social Science and Medicine, 395, Article 119023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.119023 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2026.119023

Ariawan. (2025). Regulatory barriers to consumer protection in digital marketplaces. Journal of Human Rights Culture and Legal System, 5(3), 806–832. https://doi.org/10.53948/jhcls.v5i3.214 DOI: https://doi.org/10.53955/jhcls.v5i3.782

Azam, M., Hamdoun, A. A.-M., Harahsheh, E. A. A. M., Mashdurohatun, A., & Sidauruk, H. P. (2025). Religious diversity in the digital economy: Interfaith legal pathways to harmonize Sharia, Christian ethics, and international law. Contemporary Issues on Interfaith Law and Society, 4(2), 207–264. https://doi.org/10.15294/ciils.v4i2.3301 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15294/ciils.v4i2.33011

Azam, M., Mashdurohatun, A., Firmansyah, A. N., Saktiawan, M. D., & Jaya, K. O. P. (2025). Harmonizing Contemporary International Commercial Law with Sharia-Based National Legal Systems: A Comparative Study of Pakistan, Turkey, Indonesia, Malaysia, and Saudi Arabia. MILRev: Metro Islamic Law Review, 4(2), 1074–1096. Scopus Q1. https://doi.org/10.32332/milrev.v4i2.11334 DOI: https://doi.org/10.32332/milrev.v4i2.11334

Azhari, A. M., Azhari, S., & Yaqooq, M. I. (2025). Global transformations in law, justice, and society: Comparative perspectives on governance, rights, and legal reform. International Journal of Law and Social Sciences, 1(1), 60–90. https://doi.org/10.65960/ijlss.1.1.2025.7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.65960/ijlss.1.1.2025.7

Bagheri, P., & Althabhawi, N. M. (2022).

Islamic and European perspectives on data privacy in online contracts.

European Data Protection Law Review, 8(3), 377–385.

https://doi.org/10.21552/edpl/2022/3/9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21552/edpl/2022/3/9

Boyack, A. J. (2025).

Abuse of contract: Boilerplate erasure of consumer counterparty rights.

Iowa Law Review, 110(2), 497–570.

Cherednychenko, O. O. (2024). On the bumpy road to responsible lending in the digital marketplace: The new EU Consumer Credit Directive. Journal of Consumer Policy, 47(2), 241–270. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10603-024-09564-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10603-024-09564-z

de Oliveira, C. G. B., Albuquerque, O. D. P., Belotti, E. L., Silva, R. B. D. A., & Arbix, G. (2026).

An analysis of facial recognition in banking disputes through data scraping from São Paulo court of appeal decisions.

Applied Soft Computing, 189, 114500.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2024.114500

Durovic, M., & Poon, J. (2023). Consumer vulnerability, digital fairness, and the European rules on unfair contract terms: What can be learnt from the case law against TikTok and Meta? Journal of Consumer Policy, 46(4), 419–443. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10603-023-09549-w DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10603-023-09546-7

Faisala, M. S., Karim, A., Ahmad, M., Anwer, M., Adnan, M., Hassan, M., Ahmad, K., Sohaib, H., Aziz, Q., & Liaqat, M. (2025). The Prophetic Sunnah and the challenges of the age: Confronting technology and its effects on social and psychological security. Global Islamic Research Journal, 1(1), 22–42. https://doi.org/10.65960/girj.1.1.2025.5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.65960/girj.1.1.2025.5

Giampieri, P. (2021).

An analysis of the right of termination, cancellation, and withdrawal in off-premises and distance contracts.

Comparative Legilinguistics, 47(1), 105–133.

https://doi.org/10.14746/cl.2021.47.5

Hasanah, L. N., Faisal, M. S., Ahmed, Z., & Hasyim, M. Y. A. (2025). Religious diversity and the digital economy: Legal–academic pathways to harmonize Sharia and international law. International Journal of Law and Social Sciences, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.65960/ijlss.1.1.2025.8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.65960/ijlss.1.1.2025.8

Khan, L. M., Levine, S. A. A., & Nguyen, S. T. (2025).

After notice and choice: Reinvigorating “unfairness” to rein in data abuses.

Stanford Law Review, 77(6), 1375–1461.

Le, N. (2026). Sustainable consumer data protection in Vietnam’s e-commerce: Bridging legal gaps through global insights. Prawo I Wiez, 60(1), 557–576. https://doi.org/10.36128/priw.vi60.812 DOI: https://doi.org/10.36128/19cd0230

Lyons, B., & Sugden, R. (2025).

Transactional fairness in consumer markets.

Behavioural Public Policy, 9(4), 826–848.

https://doi.org/10.1017/bpp.2023.6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/bpp.2023.6

Mak, V. (2024).

Redefining equality in European contract law: Protecting consumer interests in a post-consumer society.

European Law Open, 3(3), 561–586.

https://doi.org/10.1017/elo.2024.20 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/elo.2024.20

Marino, G. (2025).

The consumer’s right of withdrawal at the sustainability crossroads: An ecological analysis of European consumer law.

European Review of Contract Law, 21(4), 479–500.

https://doi.org/10.1515/ercl-2025-0020

Möllers, T. M. J., & Glas, J. (2025).

Paying for returns in distance contracts: Rethinking consumer protection law.

European Review of Private Law, 33(5–6), 1005–1038.

Möslein, F. (2023).

Digitized terms: The regulation of standard contract terms in the digital age.

European Review of Contract Law, 19(4), 300–320.

https://doi.org/10.1515/ercl-2023-0020

Mujiono, & Ticualu, C. (2025). Emerging trends in law and social sciences: Global perspectives on policy, ethics, justice, and institutional reform. International Journal of Law and Social Sciences, 1(1), 40–60. https://doi.org/10.65960/ijlss.1.1.2025.6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.65960/ijlss.1.1.2025.6

Mujiono, Ticualu, C., Mawardi, K., Riyadi, S., & Zuhri, B. (2025). Islamic law and campus governance against drug abuse: Preventive strategies and restorative rehabilitation in Indonesian universities. Global Islamic Research Journal, 1(1), 43–58. https://doi.org/10.65960/girj.1.1.2025.4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.65960/girj.1.1.2025.4

Mustafa, A., Ishaque, M., Raza, R., Samiullah, & Raza, M. I. (2025). When culture meets Fiqh: Examining the legal authority of ʿUrf in contemporary engagement traditions. Global Islamic Research Journal, 1(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.65960/girj.1.1.2025.6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.65960/girj.1.1.2025.6

Pałka, P., Pałosz, R., Porębski, A., & Wiśniewska, K. (2024).

A dataset on the contents of 100 terms of service of online platforms, analyzed under EU consumer law.

Data in Brief, 53, 110136.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2024.110136 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2024.110136

Sauter, W. (2024). DOI: https://doi.org/10.12968/S1356-9252(24)40042-7

Responsive competition law.

European Law Open, 3(4), 768–793.

https://doi.org/10.1017/elo.2024.35 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/elo.2024.35

Septiningsih, I., & Karimullah, S. S. (2024).

Consumer protection in the digital era: An analysis of consumer protection in e-commerce.

Nusantara Journal of Law Studies, 3(2), 68–80.

Sudirman, L., Sohheng, N., Agustianto, Agustini, S., & Nurlaily. (2025). Legal protections against unfair competition in e-commerce: Analysis of Indonesian and Thailand framework adequacy. Jurnal Hukum Novelty, 16(1), 27–42. https://doi.org/10.26555/novelty.v16i1.a28510

Tang, Y., Li, Y., & Wang, L. (2026).

The relative market power of digital platforms and consumer privacy.

Modern Economic Science, 48(1), 75–89.

Turner, S., & Tanczer, L. M. (2024).

In principle vs in practice: User, expert and policymaker attitudes towards the right to data portability in the internet of things.

Computer Law & Security Review, 52, 105912.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2023.105912 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2023.105912

📊 Statistics
📈 Abstract view : 17 times
📄 PDF views : 13 times
Citation Metrics :

Downloads

Published

04/16/2026

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Digital Marketplaces and Consumer Protection: A Comparative Socio-Legal Analysis of E-Commerce Regulation in Islamic and Western Legal Systems. (2026). International Journal of Law and Social Sciences, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.65960/ijlss.2.1.2026.11

Share